Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24951 - 24960 of 30059 for de.
Search results 24951 - 24960 of 30059 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
requires the application of constitutional principles to the facts of the case, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41885 - 2009-10-06
requires the application of constitutional principles to the facts of the case, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41885 - 2009-10-06
[PDF]
WI App 5
court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204933 - 2018-08-23
court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204933 - 2018-08-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal issue that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82152 - 2014-09-15
is a legal issue that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82152 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that this court reviews de novo, and we apply the same methodology used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380622 - 2021-06-23
of law that this court reviews de novo, and we apply the same methodology used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380622 - 2021-06-23
State v. Tony M. Smith
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8415 - 2005-03-31
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8415 - 2005-03-31
Dean Deback v. James E. White
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II DEAN DE BACK , Plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10332 - 2005-03-31
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II DEAN DE BACK , Plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10332 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court on cross-motions for summary judgment. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144506 - 2015-07-15
court on cross-motions for summary judgment. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144506 - 2015-07-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “‘[w]e review de novo the legal questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208193 - 2018-02-13
review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “‘[w]e review de novo the legal questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208193 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
WI APP 58
. 980—are employees under federal or Wisconsin minimum wage law is a question of law we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48535 - 2014-09-15
. 980—are employees under federal or Wisconsin minimum wage law is a question of law we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48535 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo.” Id. No. 2022AP854-CR 7 I. Body-worn camera footage ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786768 - 2024-04-09
of law, which we review de novo.” Id. No. 2022AP854-CR 7 I. Body-worn camera footage ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786768 - 2024-04-09