Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24971 - 24980 of 58500 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
motion. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that the trial court properly denied Evans’ second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55527 - 2010-10-13

State v. Gabriel L. Zitlow
of marijuana as a party to the crime. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4009 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gabriel L. Zitlow
. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4009 - 2017-09-20

State v. Lee D. Worby
which we review de novo and without deference to the trial court. There is a presumption that a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2917 - 2005-03-31

B&D Contractors, Inc. v. Arwin Window Systems, Inc.
., appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing its claim against Transcontinental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25250 - 2006-06-27

COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner denied the motion, found probable cause, and bound Jackson over for trial. Jackson later filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41869 - 2009-10-05

State v. James J. Kempinski
by the presentencing plea withdrawal standard of a “fair and just reason” for withdrawing a plea. Former trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2416 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, Wade’s superiors at UMOS, negligently supervised Wade. A jury trial was begun and after Jackson rested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37112 - 2009-07-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
WIS. STAT. § 980.02(1m). Smith demanded a jury trial. The jury found Smith was a sexually violent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196881 - 2017-09-21

State v. Daniel Slaughter
for misdemeanor false swearing. Slaughter seeks to withdraw his guilty plea contending that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13622 - 2005-03-31