Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24981 - 24990 of 98491 for civil court case status online.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
analysis. He asks us to remand the case to the circuit court and direct it “to determine an equitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976692 - 2025-07-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
In this case, the County argued—and the circuit court agreed—that Travis was dangerous under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380742 - 2021-06-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review the question independently of the circuit court’s determination.” Id. ¶9 In this case, both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654431 - 2023-05-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 503, 992 N.W.2d 853 (this court decides cases on the narrowest possible grounds).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=766422 - 2024-02-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 11, 2025 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035807 - 2025-11-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 16, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484577 - 2022-02-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
remand the case for the court to explain more clearly how the greater latitude rule factored into its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912744 - 2025-02-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
required by McCallum. In that case, the supreme court concluded that the recanting witness’s affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156190 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
district. We agree with the County and the circuit court that, under the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141551 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 12, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246633 - 2019-09-12