Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24991 - 25000 of 29985 for de.
Search results 24991 - 25000 of 29985 for de.
State v. Robert V. Horn
reviews de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 762, 482 N.W.2d 883 (1992). ¶8 When a party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17307 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 762, 482 N.W.2d 883 (1992). ¶8 When a party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17307 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. With these principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60511 - 2011-02-28
prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. With these principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60511 - 2011-02-28
Kathy Higgins v. Kentucky Fried Chicken
review orders granting summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13830 - 2005-03-31
review orders granting summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13830 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo, Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176706 - 2017-09-21
was deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo, Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence H. Ross
is a “constitutional fact” that we review de novo. Coerper, 199 Wis.2d at 221-22, 544 N.W.2d at 425
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9218 - 2017-09-19
is a “constitutional fact” that we review de novo. Coerper, 199 Wis.2d at 221-22, 544 N.W.2d at 425
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9218 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion, an additional analysis is also required. We consider de novo whether a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218491 - 2018-09-05
postconviction motion, an additional analysis is also required. We consider de novo whether a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218491 - 2018-09-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
in violation of the Sixth Amendment is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Baker, 169
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53404 - 2014-09-15
in violation of the Sixth Amendment is a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Baker, 169
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53404 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 10
review de novo. Goodson, 320 Wis. 2d 166, ¶7. ¶15 The parties point to no Wisconsin case addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235439 - 2019-04-05
review de novo. Goodson, 320 Wis. 2d 166, ¶7. ¶15 The parties point to no Wisconsin case addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235439 - 2019-04-05
[PDF]
WI App 22
Whether a Confrontation Clause violation has occurred is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342188 - 2021-05-10
Whether a Confrontation Clause violation has occurred is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342188 - 2021-05-10
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Everts
review de novo. State v. Price, 231 Wis. 2d 229, 234, 604 N.W.2d 898 (Ct. App. 1999). ¶29 Everts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5745 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. State v. Price, 231 Wis. 2d 229, 234, 604 N.W.2d 898 (Ct. App. 1999). ¶29 Everts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5745 - 2017-09-19