Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24991 - 25000 of 29735 for des.

[PDF] Randie Rowell v. Aldred Ash
reviews the record de novo. Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc., 209 Wis.2d 605, 614, 563 N.W.2d 154, 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14609 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lori B. v. Steven B.
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14663 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. See Tews v. NHI, LLC, 2010 WI 137, ¶40, 330
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63568 - 2011-05-02

Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Milwaukee v. City of Milwaukee
N.W.2d 816 (1987). Our review is de novo. A. Constructive Trust. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15372 - 2005-03-31

State v. Anthony D.B.
. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Curiel, 227 Wis. 2d 389, 404
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17370 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
is a legal question that we review de novo, accepting the circuit court's findings of fact unless
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599795 - 2023-01-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law for this court’s de novo review. See State v. Dodson, 219 Wis. 2d 65, 69-70, 580 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010519 - 2025-09-16

2010 WI APP 58
—are employees under federal or Wisconsin minimum wage law is a question of law we decide de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48535 - 2011-02-07

[PDF] Russell Allen v. Wisconsin Public Service Corporation
& Jacobson S.C. of River Falls, and Scott Lawrence of Lawrence & Des Rochers of St. Nazianz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6955 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 973.155, to a particular set of facts, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=506593 - 2022-04-12