Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24991 - 25000 of 69007 for had.

Timothy G. Whiteagle v. Anne E.W. Johnson
In June 2002, Whiteagle managed to obtain a hearing, claiming he had filed a motion in 1995 that had yet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7607 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ernest J. Koger v. Town of Seymour
that grounds existed for the raze order because construction had ceased for more than two years. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4092 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
had no rehabilitative need that would appropriately be addressed by the juvenile court, (2) gave great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134447 - 2015-02-10

COURT OF APPEALS
, Bowe was charged with fourth-offense operating while intoxicated.[2] The complaint alleged Bowe had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101959 - 2013-09-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
misdemeanor convictions for battery and disorderly conduct, with the result being that he should have had 90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023100 - 2025-10-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
how Julie had alienated their children from him. As noted previously, the court has wide discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144517 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
parental rights on the grounds that G.L.F. was in need of continuing protection and services and N.G. had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189239 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Sandra L. Barrette
, a neighbor of defendant Sandra Barrette, had pointed out to him the specific location of defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12919 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jill J. Kunish-Wolff
explained how Tkacz and Kunish-Wolff would come to Milwaukee together to purchase drugs and that Karlin had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12311 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
repeatedly challenged their convictions. Both had a direct appeal under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50732 - 2010-06-07