Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 251 - 260 of 17366 for Cost.
Search results 251 - 260 of 17366 for Cost.
Judy Hartman v. Winnebago County
. § 806.06(4), as a party seeking costs, Hartman was required to perfect the judgment (i.e., tax and insert
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17094 - 2005-03-31
. § 806.06(4), as a party seeking costs, Hartman was required to perfect the judgment (i.e., tax and insert
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Judy Hartman v. Winnebago County
(4), as a party seeking costs, Hartman was required to perfect the judgment (i.e., tax
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17094 - 2017-09-21
(4), as a party seeking costs, Hartman was required to perfect the judgment (i.e., tax
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17094 - 2017-09-21
Letrillian's, Inc. v. Patrick C. Miller
, to obtain replacement-cost insurance coverage for the property. Miller forwarded Billups's coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9241 - 2005-03-31
, to obtain replacement-cost insurance coverage for the property. Miller forwarded Billups's coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9241 - 2005-03-31
Thomas M. Calaway v. Village of Allouez
not consider repair cost estimates at the time it issued the raze order; (2) the value of parking spaces
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3536 - 2005-03-31
not consider repair cost estimates at the time it issued the raze order; (2) the value of parking spaces
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3536 - 2005-03-31
Wilson Realty Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Board of Review for the City of Milwaukee
the property assessment on the “cost approach” to valuation instead of the “comparable sales approach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7474 - 2005-03-31
the property assessment on the “cost approach” to valuation instead of the “comparable sales approach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7474 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael T. Schmaling
court erred when it ordered him to pay restitution to Racine County for the cost of fighting a fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8281 - 2017-09-19
court erred when it ordered him to pay restitution to Racine County for the cost of fighting a fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8281 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Wilson Realty Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Board of Review for the City of Milwaukee
assessment on the “cost approach” to valuation instead of the “comparable sales approach” to valuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7474 - 2017-09-20
assessment on the “cost approach” to valuation instead of the “comparable sales approach” to valuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7474 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Wood County v. Gregory L. Swank
of $500.00 plus costs. He makes the following arguments: (1) Wood County had no legislative authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5980 - 2017-09-19
of $500.00 plus costs. He makes the following arguments: (1) Wood County had no legislative authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5980 - 2017-09-19
Wood County v. Gregory L. Swank
a forfeiture of $500.00 plus costs. He makes the following arguments: (1) Wood County had no legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5980 - 2005-03-31
a forfeiture of $500.00 plus costs. He makes the following arguments: (1) Wood County had no legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5980 - 2005-03-31
Columbia Savings and Loan Association v. Rayford N. Drake
. Rayford Drake appeals from the trial court’s order awarding him $224 in attorney fees and costs. Drake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13334 - 2005-03-31
. Rayford Drake appeals from the trial court’s order awarding him $224 in attorney fees and costs. Drake
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13334 - 2005-03-31