Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 251 - 260 of 82869 for case search.
Search results 251 - 260 of 82869 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Shaun E. Kelley
to that dictate, one of which is presented in this case―a warrantless search is constitutionally permissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18776 - 2017-09-21
to that dictate, one of which is presented in this case―a warrantless search is constitutionally permissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18776 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joshua Ferry
illegality associated with the first search. The primary concern in attenuation cases is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8288 - 2017-09-19
illegality associated with the first search. The primary concern in attenuation cases is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8288 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 154
parties agree that the focus of the analysis in this case is on whether the search was valid under State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34133 - 2014-09-15
parties agree that the focus of the analysis in this case is on whether the search was valid under State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34133 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 154
to a parolee. However, both parties agree that the focus of the analysis in this case is on whether the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34133 - 2011-06-14
to a parolee. However, both parties agree that the focus of the analysis in this case is on whether the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34133 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
State v. Nakia N. Hayes
, 502 U.S. 873 (1991), it is supported by the rationale of that case. In Jeter, a no-knock search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8280 - 2017-09-19
, 502 U.S. 873 (1991), it is supported by the rationale of that case. In Jeter, a no-knock search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8280 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Andrews, Jr.
. Although the case did not hinge on the propriety of a search of a visitor's belongings, we find the legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16926 - 2017-09-21
. Although the case did not hinge on the propriety of a search of a visitor's belongings, we find the legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16926 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
2008 WI App 176 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP1850-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34570 - 2008-12-16
2008 WI App 176 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP1850-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34570 - 2008-12-16
[PDF]
WI APP 17
there to conduct a search.” Id. ¶13 The parties all agree that Jardines controls in this case and invalidates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107211 - 2017-09-21
there to conduct a search.” Id. ¶13 The parties all agree that Jardines controls in this case and invalidates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107211 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David R. Olofson
of the search of his car. We conclude that the police possessed a reasonable suspicion that Olofson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11835 - 2017-09-21
of the search of his car. We conclude that the police possessed a reasonable suspicion that Olofson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11835 - 2017-09-21
State v. David R. Olofson
to be searched, he argues that the police did not have a right to detain him in this case because he was not near
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11835 - 2005-03-31
to be searched, he argues that the police did not have a right to detain him in this case because he was not near
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11835 - 2005-03-31