Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 251 - 260 of 59902 for quit claim deed.
Search results 251 - 260 of 59902 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
NOTICE
241. Here, the Solises claim a mutual mistake between Sackett and Johnson in the 1967 deed creating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36615 - 2014-09-15
241. Here, the Solises claim a mutual mistake between Sackett and Johnson in the 1967 deed creating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36615 - 2014-09-15
Lawson Bender v. Karmen Lindhal
by Lindhal and invalidated the quitclaim deed, there was no reason to address any of Lindhal's other claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8396 - 2005-03-31
by Lindhal and invalidated the quitclaim deed, there was no reason to address any of Lindhal's other claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8396 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-day trial featuring experts opining on deeds and surveys, childhood stories of what the area looked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177794 - 2017-09-21
-day trial featuring experts opining on deeds and surveys, childhood stories of what the area looked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177794 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of land (the “Barber parcel”), and the deed for that parcel conveys an easement for ingress and egress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536142 - 2022-06-23
of land (the “Barber parcel”), and the deed for that parcel conveys an easement for ingress and egress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536142 - 2022-06-23
[PDF]
Lou Krepel v. Esther Darnell
it to their daughter, Edna Fassbinder. Id. This is the lot now owned by the Krepels. Id. The deed from the Ingalls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9230 - 2017-09-19
it to their daughter, Edna Fassbinder. Id. This is the lot now owned by the Krepels. Id. The deed from the Ingalls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9230 - 2017-09-19
Lou Krepel v. Esther Darnell
' easement claim appears in their chain of title by virtue of the 1952 corrective deed from Fassbinder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9230 - 2005-03-31
' easement claim appears in their chain of title by virtue of the 1952 corrective deed from Fassbinder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9230 - 2005-03-31
Robert Kucharski v. Andrew L. Kucharski, Jr.
in common. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3133 - 2005-03-31
in common. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3133 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Kucharski v. Andrew L. Kucharski, Jr.
. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest in the disputed lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3133 - 2017-09-19
. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest in the disputed lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3133 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
George Dufield v. Tom McCormick
of the existence and location of the easement. He alternatively claims he established exclusive ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7478 - 2017-09-20
of the existence and location of the easement. He alternatively claims he established exclusive ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7478 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and a fish house encroached on Finck’s property. Finck initially commenced suit against Ballard claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28339 - 2014-09-15
, and a fish house encroached on Finck’s property. Finck initially commenced suit against Ballard claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28339 - 2014-09-15