Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2501 - 2510 of 6309 for 208.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 208, 736 N.W.2d 515. At issue in this case is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231772 - 2019-01-08

[PDF] State v. Bruce Knutson
, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251 (1977). ¶8 We need not decide, however, which standard applies here. Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3163 - 2017-09-19

State v. Camille N. Skotnicki
. This furthers one of the primary purposes of restitution: to compensate the victim. See State v. Sweat, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15921 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
.2d 208 (1999) (footnote omitted). A defendant is a repeater if he or she “was convicted of a felony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144544 - 2015-07-13

[PDF] NOTICE
or modify its decisions. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 189-90, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). ¶11 We next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27611 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
or does not admit to the commission of the crime. State ex rel. Jacobus v. State, 208 Wis. 2d 35, 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27474 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Wisconsin Tobacco Co., 59 Wis. 2d 461, 465, 208 N.W.2d 373 (1973): “The trial court must undertake
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752818 - 2024-01-18

[PDF] State v. Heather C.P.
efforts are directed at determining legislative intent. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 365, 560
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12049 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. McCallum, 208 Wis. 2d 463, 473-474, 561 N.W.2d 707 (1997). When the evidence involves a witness’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12

COURT OF APPEALS
. State, 208 Wis. 2d 35, 54, 559 N.W.2d 900 (1997); see also North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27474 - 2006-12-18