Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2501 - 2510 of 29810 for des.
Search results 2501 - 2510 of 29810 for des.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gary A. Miller
reviewed the family court commissioner's decision de novo and in October 2002 issued a written decision
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20065 - 2005-10-24
reviewed the family court commissioner's decision de novo and in October 2002 issued a written decision
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20065 - 2005-10-24
State v. Todd J. Gerrits
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15311 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15311 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. Howard, 246 Wis. 2d 475, ¶15. ¶10 Sharrard correctly states that all parties agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36585 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. Howard, 246 Wis. 2d 475, ¶15. ¶10 Sharrard correctly states that all parties agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36585 - 2014-09-15
County of Rusk v. Keith R. Aussem
subject to de novo review. See State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18, 241 Wis. 2d 631, 623 N.W.2d 106. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5736 - 2005-03-31
subject to de novo review. See State v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18, 241 Wis. 2d 631, 623 N.W.2d 106. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5736 - 2005-03-31
Casanova Retail Liquor Store, Inc. v. State
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9079 - 2005-03-31
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9079 - 2005-03-31
Timothy Wrase v. City of Neenah
with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted that even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13316 - 2005-03-31
with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted that even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13316 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Metz
ultimate findings on consent and voluntariness—is de novo. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d at 194–195, 577 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15259 - 2005-03-31
ultimate findings on consent and voluntariness—is de novo. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d at 194–195, 577 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15259 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we consider de novo. Landwehr v. Landwehr, 2006 WI 64, ¶8, 291 Wis. 2d 49, 715 N.W.2d 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39276 - 2009-08-11
is a question of law we consider de novo. Landwehr v. Landwehr, 2006 WI 64, ¶8, 291 Wis. 2d 49, 715 N.W.2d 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39276 - 2009-08-11
Helen Schlicht v. Bridget Mary VanDyke
of law which we decide de novo. See Nottelson v. ILHR Dept., 94 Wis. 2d 106, 116, 287 N.W.2d 763 (1980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6453 - 2005-03-31
of law which we decide de novo. See Nottelson v. ILHR Dept., 94 Wis. 2d 106, 116, 287 N.W.2d 763 (1980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6453 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clifton M. Wright
or statutory rights were violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 86, 522 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10817 - 2005-03-31
or statutory rights were violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 86, 522 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10817 - 2005-03-31