Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2501 - 2510 of 12798 for se.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Peter J. Long, pro se, appeals orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027277 - 2025-10-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
filed a pro se motion for sentence modification. In that motion, Mulikin asserted that a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705857 - 2023-09-26

COURT OF APPEALS
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kenneth Driessen, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction for possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61402 - 2011-03-21

COURT OF APPEALS
prior to the scheduled trial date. Colten appeared at trial pro se, purporting to represent Historic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81888 - 2012-05-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). David D. Ramage, pro se, appeals an order denying his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204972 - 2017-12-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 GUNDRUM, J. 1 David R. Olofson appeals pro se from a judgment for garnishment. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218042 - 2018-08-22

COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Edward Thomas Nisiewicz, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59174 - 2011-01-24

COURT OF APPEALS
reply to the defendant’s substantive arguments on appeal. BACKGROUND ¶2 Gray was pro se below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100888 - 2013-08-14

[PDF] NOTICE
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Edward Thomas Nisiewicz, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59174 - 2014-09-15

City of Eau Claire v. Christopher A. Jerram
, with Jerram defending his case pro se. The material facts were generally undisputed, except that Jerram
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20984 - 2006-01-17