Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25001 - 25010 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 25001 - 25010 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
State v. Andre L. Avery
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2873-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11530 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2873-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11530 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
challenged acts or omissions were objectively unreasonable under all the circumstances of the case. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144662 - 2015-07-21
challenged acts or omissions were objectively unreasonable under all the circumstances of the case. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144662 - 2015-07-21
State v. Paul L. Polak
2002 WI App 120 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1873-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 120 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1873-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the appeal was frivolous and remanded the case with directions to the circuit court to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44371 - 2014-09-15
that the appeal was frivolous and remanded the case with directions to the circuit court to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44371 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. For the reasons stated below, we reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935377 - 2025-04-01
. For the reasons stated below, we reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=935377 - 2025-04-01
[PDF]
WI APP 29
2013 WI APP 29 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP1304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92330 - 2014-09-15
2013 WI APP 29 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP1304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92330 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Prior to the filing of the divorce case, which occurred on May 21, 2010, Belter obtained a domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102716 - 2014-08-14
. Prior to the filing of the divorce case, which occurred on May 21, 2010, Belter obtained a domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102716 - 2014-08-14
State v. Harris D. Byers
that (1) the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to take a plea in a ch. 980 case; (2) if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15994 - 2005-03-31
that (1) the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to take a plea in a ch. 980 case; (2) if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15994 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Thomas M.
of speech, and are unconstitutionally vague because they are not defined. But the cases he cites
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15617 - 2017-09-21
of speech, and are unconstitutionally vague because they are not defined. But the cases he cites
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15617 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Thomas M.
of speech, and are unconstitutionally vague because they are not defined. But the cases he cites
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15616 - 2017-09-21
of speech, and are unconstitutionally vague because they are not defined. But the cases he cites
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15616 - 2017-09-21