Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25001 - 25010 of 30247 for de.
Search results 25001 - 25010 of 30247 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Tondalia K.
decides de novo. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis.2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47, 49-50 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14634 - 2017-09-21
decides de novo. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis.2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47, 49-50 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14634 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 29
uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108162 - 2017-09-21
uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109777 - 2017-09-21
a question of law subject to de novo review. McNeil v. Hansen, 2007 WI 56, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 358, 731 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109777 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 112
, we review the application of those facts to constitutional principles de novo. Id. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86921 - 2014-09-15
, we review the application of those facts to constitutional principles de novo. Id. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86921 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presented at trial ultimately was sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173922 - 2017-09-21
presented at trial ultimately was sufficient to support the conviction is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173922 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott Leason Badker
of fact satisfy a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Dagnall, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16191 - 2005-03-31
of fact satisfy a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Dagnall, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16191 - 2005-03-31
Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
which we should review de novo, or to which we should accord, at most, “due weight” deference. The WERC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12774 - 2005-03-31
which we should review de novo, or to which we should accord, at most, “due weight” deference. The WERC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12774 - 2005-03-31
Karen R. Yocherer v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
and the insurance policy, which are questions of law that we decide de novo. Magyar v. Physicians Ins. Co., 2001 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16373 - 2005-03-31
and the insurance policy, which are questions of law that we decide de novo. Magyar v. Physicians Ins. Co., 2001 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16373 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
damages. ¶11 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Freer v. M & I Marshall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212208 - 2018-05-02
damages. ¶11 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Freer v. M & I Marshall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212208 - 2018-05-02
[PDF]
State v. John W. Kelley
STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶8 We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15420 - 2017-09-21
STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶8 We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15420 - 2017-09-21