Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25001 - 25010 of 29739 for des.
Search results 25001 - 25010 of 29739 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Evans
professional judgment. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7046 - 2017-09-20
professional judgment. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7046 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which we review de novo. Id. It is the jury’s function to decide the credibility of witnesses. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35952 - 2014-09-15
, which we review de novo. Id. It is the jury’s function to decide the credibility of witnesses. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35952 - 2014-09-15
Nu-Roc Nursing Home, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
of statutes, administrative regulations and federal guidelines are questions of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9205 - 2005-03-31
of statutes, administrative regulations and federal guidelines are questions of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9205 - 2005-03-31
Tara L. Harrison v. Pat Richter
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11537 - 2005-03-31
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11537 - 2005-03-31
Erika Eneman v. Pat Richter
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11536 - 2005-03-31
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11536 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See Laughland v. Beckett, 2015 WI App 70, ¶21, 365 Wis. 2d 148, 870 N.W.2d 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181183 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See Laughland v. Beckett, 2015 WI App 70, ¶21, 365 Wis. 2d 148, 870 N.W.2d 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181183 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact which we review de novo, but with the benefit of the trial court’s analysis. Ernst, 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75747 - 2014-09-15
of constitutional fact which we review de novo, but with the benefit of the trial court’s analysis. Ernst, 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75747 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26853 - 2014-09-15
and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26853 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121339 - 2014-09-15
and whether the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121339 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we consider de novo. State v. Rice, 2008 WI App 10, ¶14, 307 Wis. 2d 335, 743 N.W.2d 517
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130933 - 2014-12-01
of law that we consider de novo. State v. Rice, 2008 WI App 10, ¶14, 307 Wis. 2d 335, 743 N.W.2d 517
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130933 - 2014-12-01