Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25001 - 25010 of 34033 for dismissal.
Search results 25001 - 25010 of 34033 for dismissal.
[PDF]
State v. Danny P.
: “A finding of unfitness shall not preclude a dismissal of a petition” for termination. See also K.D.J. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11766 - 2017-09-20
: “A finding of unfitness shall not preclude a dismissal of a petition” for termination. See also K.D.J. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11766 - 2017-09-20
State v. Justin David Schwartz
of misdemeanor theft. The second count was dismissed and read in. The court set a sentencing date of January 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7220 - 2005-03-31
of misdemeanor theft. The second count was dismissed and read in. The court set a sentencing date of January 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7220 - 2005-03-31
Joseph R. Parenteau v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
App 85 at ¶24. The commission is justified in dismissing Parenteau’s doctors’ opinions if those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3664 - 2005-03-31
App 85 at ¶24. The commission is justified in dismissing Parenteau’s doctors’ opinions if those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3664 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stanley Hess
dismissed the penalty enhancer. The trial court convicted Hess of the charged offense and sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10591 - 2005-03-31
dismissed the penalty enhancer. The trial court convicted Hess of the charged offense and sentenced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10591 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
§ 980.02(1m), its reliance on one offense that could no longer qualify would not justify dismissal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134234 - 2015-02-02
§ 980.02(1m), its reliance on one offense that could no longer qualify would not justify dismissal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134234 - 2015-02-02
COURT OF APPEALS
and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jill Ardis appeals a summary judgment dismissing an objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50850 - 2010-06-14
and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jill Ardis appeals a summary judgment dismissing an objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50850 - 2010-06-14
County of Walworth v. William H. Guth
not address it. Furthermore, dismissal would likely have been without prejudice because public interests were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25344 - 2006-05-30
not address it. Furthermore, dismissal would likely have been without prejudice because public interests were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25344 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas J. Barbian
as a habitual criminal? [Later, the trial court dismissed the penalty enhancer for one count due to the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18075 - 2017-09-21
as a habitual criminal? [Later, the trial court dismissed the penalty enhancer for one count due to the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18075 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
actions were dismissed as untimely because Pulera had failed to file her certiorari petition within 30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204744 - 2017-12-07
actions were dismissed as untimely because Pulera had failed to file her certiorari petition within 30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204744 - 2017-12-07
CA Blank Order
his brief so this court dismissed the appeal. Eleventh Postconviction Motion/Sixth Appeal: Finally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103068 - 2013-10-10
his brief so this court dismissed the appeal. Eleventh Postconviction Motion/Sixth Appeal: Finally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103068 - 2013-10-10