Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25001 - 25010 of 63519 for records/1000.
Search results 25001 - 25010 of 63519 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
recitation of the facts comes directly from the record and the trial court’s findings. The trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63801 - 2011-05-10
recitation of the facts comes directly from the record and the trial court’s findings. The trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63801 - 2011-05-10
Dwayne Seals v. David H. Schwarz
, the record may be closely examined “to determine whether adequate notice was given to constitute fair warning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4466 - 2005-03-31
, the record may be closely examined “to determine whether adequate notice was given to constitute fair warning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4466 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Adam C.
3 the motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing, concluding that “the record as a whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13438 - 2017-09-21
3 the motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing, concluding that “the record as a whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13438 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324284 - 2021-01-20
argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. After review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324284 - 2021-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702291 - 2023-09-13
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702291 - 2023-09-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2017AP743-CR 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217679 - 2018-08-10
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2017AP743-CR 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217679 - 2018-08-10
[PDF]
Scott Cecil v. KJH Enterprises, Inc.
of the proceedings. The record shows that the trial court rationally considered all of the No. 98-1483-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14062 - 2014-09-15
of the proceedings. The record shows that the trial court rationally considered all of the No. 98-1483-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14062 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Suzanne Marie Johnson v. Norman T. Johnson
, including the property brought into the marriage by each of the parties. The record does not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14132 - 2014-09-15
, including the property brought into the marriage by each of the parties. The record does not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14132 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602068 - 2022-12-21
considering the no-merit report and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602068 - 2022-12-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert Garel
denied his postconviction motion for sentence credit. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13659 - 2017-09-21
denied his postconviction motion for sentence credit. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13659 - 2017-09-21