Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25001 - 25010 of 58267 for speedy trial.

State v. Steven E. Carr
, nonconsensual entry of a resident’s room while the resident was sleeping. The trial court deemed it unnecessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11433 - 2005-03-31

City of Milwaukee v. Roadster LLC
with the operation of its business. ¶2 Coakley claims the trial court erred as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5904 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ilir Aliji
probable cause to arrest him; (4) the trial court should have granted his motion seeking to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14150 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ameritech Advanced Data Services of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
. Ameritech Advanced Data Services of Wisconsin, Inc. (AADS) appeals from a trial court order that affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12527 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
children. Elyn filed for divorce in June 2007. On the morning originally set for trial, the court learned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102087 - 2013-09-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred by permitting the State to elicit evidence at trial that Brinkmeier had refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100249 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
intimidation of a witness. The matters were joined and proceeded to a jury trial. Amber testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307313 - 2020-11-24

[PDF] WI APP 31
have testified at trial, that the circuit court failed to apply the statutory criteria when granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59779 - 2014-09-15

Mark Lattimore v. Caldon Rushing
Kratsch acknowledged at trial that he received $89 from Lattimore as a security deposit. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24572 - 2006-03-22

[PDF] Village of Deerfield v.
of the Village of Deerfield, and from an order denying his postverdict motions. He argues that (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11781 - 2017-09-20