Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25011 - 25020 of 61793 for does.
Search results 25011 - 25020 of 61793 for does.
[PDF]
State v. Lamont Williams
is procedurally barred and Blakely does not apply retroactively to his case, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7630 - 2017-09-19
is procedurally barred and Blakely does not apply retroactively to his case, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7630 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2009-10). Grall’s statement of the case does not set forth any factual information or record citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64696 - 2011-05-23
) (2009-10). Grall’s statement of the case does not set forth any factual information or record citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64696 - 2011-05-23
[PDF]
Milwaukee County v. Robert E. Berry
, certainly supports an argument that the access road does not satisfy the Richling definition. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14922 - 2017-09-21
, certainly supports an argument that the access road does not satisfy the Richling definition. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Baron L. Walker, Sr. v. Daniel Bertrand
was not mentioned in the report and could perhaps give a written statement. The record does not indicate, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13550 - 2017-09-21
was not mentioned in the report and could perhaps give a written statement. The record does not indicate, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13550 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Glen Proeber, Jr.
. It does not say, however, as Proeber insists, that an officer cannot read that portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10060 - 2017-09-19
. It does not say, however, as Proeber insists, that an officer cannot read that portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10060 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment that is on appeal. Absent a remand of the record, it does deprive the trial court of jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32894 - 2008-06-02
judgment that is on appeal. Absent a remand of the record, it does deprive the trial court of jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32894 - 2008-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
appellate issues. However, the defendant in a conventional appeal does not receive the benefit of a skilled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27385 - 2006-12-11
appellate issues. However, the defendant in a conventional appeal does not receive the benefit of a skilled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27385 - 2006-12-11
State v. Antonio Jones
). The record does not support Jones’s misuse of discretion claim. The court did not sentence Jones for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14343 - 2005-03-31
). The record does not support Jones’s misuse of discretion claim. The court did not sentence Jones for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14343 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and is therefore not a “new factor” justifying sentence modification. Because Williams does not allege a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01
and is therefore not a “new factor” justifying sentence modification. Because Williams does not allege a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01
Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company v. John J. Deluhery
that he did not receive the policy, Hawkeye contends that this “factual issue is not material and does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9663 - 2005-03-31
that he did not receive the policy, Hawkeye contends that this “factual issue is not material and does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9663 - 2005-03-31