Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25021 - 25030 of 84538 for case number.
Search results 25021 - 25030 of 84538 for case number.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas L. Blonigen
that counsel believed Parzy and the victim’s father had credibility problems because they had a large number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19788 - 2017-09-21
that counsel believed Parzy and the victim’s father had credibility problems because they had a large number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19788 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient income “despite the numbers on the income tax returns.” ¶9 Daryl argues that once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72184 - 2015-03-15
sufficient income “despite the numbers on the income tax returns.” ¶9 Daryl argues that once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72184 - 2015-03-15
COURT OF APPEALS
unless otherwise noted. [2] In her appellate brief, Siciliano presents a number of calculations to bring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31013 - 2015-07-30
unless otherwise noted. [2] In her appellate brief, Siciliano presents a number of calculations to bring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31013 - 2015-07-30
[PDF]
State v. David Haecker
court also ordered a number of probation conditions, including ten days at the House of Correction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13375 - 2017-09-21
court also ordered a number of probation conditions, including ten days at the House of Correction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13375 - 2017-09-21
State v. David P. Byrne
offender. Specifically, he argues that § 301.45(1d)(b) defines “sex offense” as a violation of a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5344 - 2009-12-27
offender. Specifically, he argues that § 301.45(1d)(b) defines “sex offense” as a violation of a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5344 - 2009-12-27
State v. Amanda A. Ringler
statement: Number one, is there probable cause to arrest? I submit to the Court that we have two witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3984 - 2005-03-31
statement: Number one, is there probable cause to arrest? I submit to the Court that we have two witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3984 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Counsel stated that the letter was not returned as undeliverable, and that the phone number he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91454 - 2013-01-07
. Counsel stated that the letter was not returned as undeliverable, and that the phone number he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91454 - 2013-01-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as case number 2017AP1771. 3 The Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare (BMCW) has since been renamed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218074 - 2018-08-28
as case number 2017AP1771. 3 The Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare (BMCW) has since been renamed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218074 - 2018-08-28
[PDF]
Letter Brief (Citizen Mathematicians)
, et al., Case no. 2021AP1450–OA Dear Ms. Reiff: Proposed Intervenors Gary Krenz, Sarah J
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/ltrbriefcitizenmathematicians.pdf - 2021-10-18
, et al., Case no. 2021AP1450–OA Dear Ms. Reiff: Proposed Intervenors Gary Krenz, Sarah J
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/ltrbriefcitizenmathematicians.pdf - 2021-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the scheduled trial, and the State refiled the same charges against the client under a 2012 case number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171379 - 2017-09-21
of the scheduled trial, and the State refiled the same charges against the client under a 2012 case number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171379 - 2017-09-21