Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25021 - 25030 of 83546 for case search.
Search results 25021 - 25030 of 83546 for case search.
[PDF]
Justin L. Ruckel v. Troy W. Gassner
2002 WI 67 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 00-2036 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16408 - 2017-09-21
2002 WI 67 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 00-2036 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16408 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Outagamie County cases on April 4, 2017—more than six months before the complaint was filed in Allison’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468381 - 2021-12-29
Outagamie County cases on April 4, 2017—more than six months before the complaint was filed in Allison’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468381 - 2021-12-29
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steve J. Polich
2005 WI 36 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 03-1071-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31
2005 WI 36 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 03-1071-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16779 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
These consolidated appeals involve orders of the Portage County Circuit Court closing CHIPS cases for three minor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=799343 - 2024-05-09
These consolidated appeals involve orders of the Portage County Circuit Court closing CHIPS cases for three minor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=799343 - 2024-05-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
was too harsh a sanction in this case, it nonetheless entered an order denying the motion to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47154 - 2014-09-15
was too harsh a sanction in this case, it nonetheless entered an order denying the motion to reopen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47154 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
easement dispute case between the Veaches and the Barbers. See Veach v. Barber, No. 2021AP1030
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869656 - 2024-11-01
easement dispute case between the Veaches and the Barbers. See Veach v. Barber, No. 2021AP1030
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869656 - 2024-11-01
[PDF]
State v. Mark M. Loutsch
2003 WI App 16 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1755-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5432 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 16 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-1755-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5432 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is at the maximum, in which case the court has the discretion to commute the excessive component to the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402480 - 2021-07-30
is at the maximum, in which case the court has the discretion to commute the excessive component to the maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402480 - 2021-07-30
Brandon Apparel Group, Inc. v. Pearson Properties, Ltd.
2001 WI App 205 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-2532 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3042 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 205 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-2532 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3042 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Higginbotham, P.J., Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 BRIDGE, J. This case involves two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30574 - 2007-10-10
. Before Higginbotham, P.J., Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 BRIDGE, J. This case involves two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30574 - 2007-10-10