Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25021 - 25030 of 58981 for quit claim deed.
Search results 25021 - 25030 of 58981 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - February 2012
all, economic benefits of their property. As to the Wickenhausers’ claim, the trial court held
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77627 - 2014-09-15
all, economic benefits of their property. As to the Wickenhausers’ claim, the trial court held
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77627 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March 2023
arguments, Miller claimed that Wis. Stat. § 19.59(1)(d) was unconstitutional and violated his rights under
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631919 - 2023-03-08
arguments, Miller claimed that Wis. Stat. § 19.59(1)(d) was unconstitutional and violated his rights under
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631919 - 2023-03-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that induced his pleas. Thomas therefore claimed counsel’s ineffective communication caused his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119619 - 2014-09-15
that induced his pleas. Thomas therefore claimed counsel’s ineffective communication caused his pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119619 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the note and mortgage. They also raised as an affirmative defense that Wells Fargo’s claims were barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115628 - 2014-06-30
of the note and mortgage. They also raised as an affirmative defense that Wells Fargo’s claims were barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115628 - 2014-06-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in granting the City’s motion because the statute of limitations time-bars the claims. Murphy also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74375 - 2014-09-15
in granting the City’s motion because the statute of limitations time-bars the claims. Murphy also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74375 - 2014-09-15
Marion Steinberg v. Thomas R. Jensen
., to reverse “in the interest of justice.” II. DISCUSSION The Steinbergs claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7684 - 2005-03-31
., to reverse “in the interest of justice.” II. DISCUSSION The Steinbergs claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7684 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the infant victim’s mother.[1] We reject his claims and affirm the judgment. ¶2 Reimer was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32813 - 2008-05-27
of the infant victim’s mother.[1] We reject his claims and affirm the judgment. ¶2 Reimer was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32813 - 2008-05-27
State v. Richard A. Thomas
reduction. He claims that the trial court erred when it “misinterpret[ed] critical facts concerning [his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12743 - 2005-03-31
reduction. He claims that the trial court erred when it “misinterpret[ed] critical facts concerning [his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12743 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
injustice existed and any errors were harmless. DISCUSSION ¶6 Miller claims the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135542 - 2015-02-23
injustice existed and any errors were harmless. DISCUSSION ¶6 Miller claims the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135542 - 2015-02-23
[PDF]
State v. Eric Pittman
the order denying a mistrial. ¶8 Pittman next raises various claims of ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13994 - 2014-09-15
the order denying a mistrial. ¶8 Pittman next raises various claims of ineffective assistance of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13994 - 2014-09-15