Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25031 - 25040 of 77006 for judgment for u s.
Search results 25031 - 25040 of 77006 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
State v. Linda A.W.
terminated Linda A.W.’s parental rights to Cody; 2) there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4654 - 2017-09-19
terminated Linda A.W.’s parental rights to Cody; 2) there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4654 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entered on February 6, 2018. Since the time of its original filing, R.B.L.’s protective placement has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671791 - 2023-06-27
entered on February 6, 2018. Since the time of its original filing, R.B.L.’s protective placement has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671791 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
presented “enough information to justify a modification of the sentence[s].” During a subsequent hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903858 - 2025-01-22
presented “enough information to justify a modification of the sentence[s].” During a subsequent hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903858 - 2025-01-22
State v. Kerby G. Denman
VERGERONT, J. Kerby Denman appeals the trial court’s judgment determining he is a sexually violent person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15747 - 2005-03-31
VERGERONT, J. Kerby Denman appeals the trial court’s judgment determining he is a sexually violent person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15747 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kenyota A.
is the children’s father. Ultimately, the court concluded that based on prior paternity judgments and the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3874 - 2005-03-31
is the children’s father. Ultimately, the court concluded that based on prior paternity judgments and the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3874 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
treatment to the extent authorized under s. 51.30(4)(d)1, STATS., and this subsection. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21
treatment to the extent authorized under s. 51.30(4)(d)1, STATS., and this subsection. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment of conviction, the denial of postconviction relief, and the denial of reconsideration. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465710 - 2021-12-21
the judgment of conviction, the denial of postconviction relief, and the denial of reconsideration. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465710 - 2021-12-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to look at everything and make a judgment call, and all that goes into what I talk to the client about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236820 - 2019-03-13
to look at everything and make a judgment call, and all that goes into what I talk to the client about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236820 - 2019-03-13
[PDF]
State of the Judiciary Address 2011
STATE OF THE JUDICIARY ADDRESS 2011 Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson
/publications/speeches/docs/judaddress11.pdf - 2011-11-02
STATE OF THE JUDICIARY ADDRESS 2011 Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson
/publications/speeches/docs/judaddress11.pdf - 2011-11-02
[PDF]
Appendix to Reply Brief per CTO of 11-17-21 (BLOC).pdf
hereby certify that filed with this brief is an appendix that complies with s. 809.19 (2
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/appbriefctobloc2.pdf - 2022-01-04
hereby certify that filed with this brief is an appendix that complies with s. 809.19 (2
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/appbriefctobloc2.pdf - 2022-01-04