Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25031 - 25040 of 67883 for law.

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
-person jury panel issue because the law at the time required the six-person jury panel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court erroneously exercises its discretion, however, if it bases its decision on an error of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193099 - 2017-09-21

Larry R.W. v. Alan F.S.
jurisdiction under the law of such State; and (2) one of the following conditions is met: ... (E) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7889 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
prescribed by law and instituted for the purpose of vacating, reviewing, or annulling it.’” (Citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33707 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Matthew M. v. Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services
a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5743 - 2017-09-19

James R. Schultz v. Gerald Berge
the agency stayed within its jurisdiction; (2) whether it acted according to law; (3) whether its action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11567 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ryan C. Rumlow
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Id. at 137-38. DISCUSSION ¶9 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3397 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
denied Gierl’s request. The District explained: Under the Public Records Law, a request that contains
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737381 - 2023-12-06

State v. Stacy Wayne Willis
. After having identified himself or herself as a law enforcement officer, a law enforcement officer may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5158 - 2005-03-31

Matthew M. v. Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services
)(a). ¶7 Whether a party has met the burden of proof is a question of law we review de novo. Brandt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5743 - 2005-03-31