Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25031 - 25040 of 58506 for speedy trial.

Duane Taylor v. St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin
§ 814.03(1) Stats. St. Croix and Dunkley further cross-appeal from the trial court's refusal to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14803 - 2005-03-31

2011 WI APP 31
after witnesses have testified at trial, that the circuit court failed to apply the statutory criteria
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59779 - 2012-01-22

State v. Steven E. Carr
, nonconsensual entry of a resident’s room while the resident was sleeping. The trial court deemed it unnecessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11433 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Janet Kielas v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
and Walter Kielas could not be enforced because of contextual ambiguity. Farmers contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7431 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Dennis Lee Londo
. The State of Wisconsin appeals from orders entered by the trial court granting: 1) a motion made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3842 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Duane Taylor v. St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin
) STATS. St. Croix and Dunkley further cross-appeal from the trial court's refusal to grant, or even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14803 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, JJ. ¶1 KLOPPENBURG, J. The evening before trial was to begin, the prosecutor disclosed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93381 - 2013-02-27

Ameritech Advanced Data Services of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
from a trial court order that affirmed the Public Service Commission’s order denying AADS certification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12527 - 2005-03-31

State v. Keith M. Carey
to stand trial. The State argues that the circuit erred in concluding that it did not have the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6583 - 2005-03-31

State v. Keith M. Carey
to stand trial. The State argues that the circuit erred in concluding that it did not have the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6582 - 2005-03-31