Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25041 - 25050 of 36505 for e z e.

State v. Michael J. Weber
to reclassify his substantial battery conviction from a Class E felony to a Class I felony to reflect changes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7258 - 2005-03-31

N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
). The statute's purpose is not to compensate victims but to "[g]iv[e] parents a financial incentive to prevent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eric S. Fenz
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and William L. Gansner, assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4012 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
endangering safety, a Class G felony, which was later amended to aggravated battery, a Class E felony. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53250 - 2010-08-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to this case, means “[e]ngaging in a course of conduct or repeatedly committing acts which harass
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158312 - 2017-09-21

Terry DeMario v. Donald J. Zoltan, M.D.
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JOHN E. McCORMICK, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8363 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frederick T. West v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
permanent. Dr. Nesemann also concluded in a separate practitioner's report that West should engage in “[e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9712 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
whether there was probable cause to arrest Swanson for operating under the influence: “[W]e need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Keefe S. Adams
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Michael R. Klos, asst. attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10950 - 2017-09-19

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
for review resulted in waiver of circuit court’s loss of competency) and Mueller, 105 Wis. 2d at 177-78 (“[E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6210 - 2005-03-31