Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25041 - 25050 of 38507 for t's.
Search results 25041 - 25050 of 38507 for t's.
State v. Quinton K. Washington
the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. “In order to show prejudice, ‘[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10844 - 2005-03-31
the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. “In order to show prejudice, ‘[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10844 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 6, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540149 - 2022-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 6, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540149 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473309 - 2022-01-19
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473309 - 2022-01-19
Michael D. Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
that the principle of fortuity precluded coverage. We disagreed, concluding that “[t]hirteen-year-old Leuck’s act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12676 - 2005-03-31
that the principle of fortuity precluded coverage. We disagreed, concluding that “[t]hirteen-year-old Leuck’s act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12676 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
answered that the hospital had the records. Karmen’s attorney then informed Karmen, “[T]he judge is trying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136565 - 2015-03-04
answered that the hospital had the records. Karmen’s attorney then informed Karmen, “[T]he judge is trying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136565 - 2015-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, “[t]he determination of whether that new factor justifies sentence modification is committed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
, “[t]he determination of whether that new factor justifies sentence modification is committed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005611 - 2025-09-09
Village of Elm Grove v. Tina Fleming
. ¶4 Both Officer Jeffrey Lenderman and Sergeant T. M. Mackesey arrived on the scene to assist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5138 - 2005-03-31
. ¶4 Both Officer Jeffrey Lenderman and Sergeant T. M. Mackesey arrived on the scene to assist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5138 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to preserve it. “[T]o rise to the level of a due process violation, evidence not preserved, lost or destroyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47193 - 2010-02-23
to preserve it. “[T]o rise to the level of a due process violation, evidence not preserved, lost or destroyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47193 - 2010-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
clause. Id. In so doing, we observed that “[t]he parties agreed to the elasticity clause in Hanson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108361 - 2014-02-24
clause. Id. In so doing, we observed that “[t]he parties agreed to the elasticity clause in Hanson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108361 - 2014-02-24
State v. Travis E. Blanks
(1973) ("[I]t is clear that the right to challenge a jury array as embodied in the jury list
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
(1973) ("[I]t is clear that the right to challenge a jury array as embodied in the jury list
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31