Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25051 - 25060 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
Search results 25051 - 25060 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
State v. Samuel H. Warp
guilty to the underlying charge and only tried the mental status issue to the court. However, a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14337 - 2014-09-15
guilty to the underlying charge and only tried the mental status issue to the court. However, a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14337 - 2014-09-15
State v. Samuel H. Warp
to the underlying charge and only tried the mental status issue to the court. However, a court is not bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14337 - 2005-03-31
to the underlying charge and only tried the mental status issue to the court. However, a court is not bound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14337 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger Lenox
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2001 Cornelia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4134 - 2017-09-20
NOTICE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2001 Cornelia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4134 - 2017-09-20
State v. Roger Lenox
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4134 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4134 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the supreme court’s decision in Prado—which was not yet in effect at the time of the stop in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619783 - 2023-02-07
the supreme court’s decision in Prado—which was not yet in effect at the time of the stop in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619783 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 8, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422447 - 2021-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 8, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422447 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factors as the court may in each individual case determine to be relevant.” WIS. STAT. § 767.61(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249335 - 2019-10-30
factors as the court may in each individual case determine to be relevant.” WIS. STAT. § 767.61(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249335 - 2019-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 12, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237023 - 2019-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 12, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237023 - 2019-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will uphold the postconviction court’s factual findings, which “include ‘the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252205 - 2020-01-14
will uphold the postconviction court’s factual findings, which “include ‘the circumstances of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252205 - 2020-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 9, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286064 - 2020-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 9, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286064 - 2020-09-09