Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25051 - 25060 of 29985 for de.
Search results 25051 - 25060 of 29985 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. Id. “A defendant who requests resentencing due to the circuit court’s use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253587 - 2020-02-06
that we review de novo. Id. “A defendant who requests resentencing due to the circuit court’s use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253587 - 2020-02-06
State v. Julie Ann Quinn
review de novo. See State v. Martin, 156 Wis.2d 399, 402, 456 N.W.2d 892, 894 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13629 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Martin, 156 Wis.2d 399, 402, 456 N.W.2d 892, 894 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is irrelevant because there has been no Bangert violation. Again, the issue is one of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265368 - 2020-06-23
is irrelevant because there has been no Bangert violation. Again, the issue is one of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265368 - 2020-06-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Hutson v. State of Wis. Pers. Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194404 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Hutson v. State of Wis. Pers. Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194404 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 85
. § 227.40(4)(a). When determining if an agency rule exceeds statutory authority, we apply a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175873 - 2017-09-21
. § 227.40(4)(a). When determining if an agency rule exceeds statutory authority, we apply a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175873 - 2017-09-21
Appeal No
. The parties essentially agree that the standard of review of an arbitration award is de novo, and is described
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58795 - 2011-01-10
. The parties essentially agree that the standard of review of an arbitration award is de novo, and is described
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58795 - 2011-01-10
2007 WI APP 181
review de novo. Kimberly Area School Dist. v. LIRC, 2005 WI App 262, ¶9, 288 Wis. 2d 542, 707 N.W.2d 872
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29515 - 2007-07-25
review de novo. Kimberly Area School Dist. v. LIRC, 2005 WI App 262, ¶9, 288 Wis. 2d 542, 707 N.W.2d 872
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29515 - 2007-07-25
Dennis L. Jacobson v. American Tool Companies, Inc.
that we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389, 394
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12824 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389, 394
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12824 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 36
to undisputed facts is a question of law for our de novo review. See Knight v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28134 - 2014-09-15
to undisputed facts is a question of law for our de novo review. See Knight v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28134 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 210
judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶9 Here, Cuellar contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26418 - 2014-09-15
judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶9 Here, Cuellar contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26418 - 2014-09-15