Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25051 - 25060 of 61147 for quit claim deed/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
chooses to serve as guardian ad litem. Here, the trial court rejected Earl’s claim that Rogers was biased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30998 - 2007-11-28

[PDF] State v. Demetrius Newman
Newman claims: (1) the trial court erred when it took judicial notice of co-defendant Andrae Bridges’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13946 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Rainbow Springs Golf Company, Inc. v. Town of Mukwonago
takings claim against the Town of Mukwonago. In May 2003, the Town revoked a conditional use permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18336 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Murry claims that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27521 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
claims for postconviction relief from his sentences.[1] He asserts that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125231 - 2014-10-27

[PDF] Maria L. Dorantes v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
and Jacquez Automotive Service (collectively, “Jacquez”), and dismissing her slip-and-fall claim, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4065 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
appeals a judgment dismissing his small claims action against NCI Group, Inc. (NCI), in which he alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250937 - 2019-12-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that dismissed on summary judgment his claims for breach of contract, breach of covenant of good faith and fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103342 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
motion. Murry claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27521 - 2006-12-26

[PDF] State v. Ralph Ovadal
A. Findings of Fact ¶8 Ovadal first claims the evidence does not support the court’s findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6152 - 2017-09-19