Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25061 - 25070 of 38970 for c's.
Search results 25061 - 25070 of 38970 for c's.
State v. Tory L. Rachel
. It states that “[c]hapters 801 to 847 govern procedure and practice in circuit courts of this state in all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14282 - 2010-08-30
. It states that “[c]hapters 801 to 847 govern procedure and practice in circuit courts of this state in all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14282 - 2010-08-30
State v. Craig A. Zempel
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2010-08-30
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2010-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
. Accordingly, Critton’s ineffective assistance claims are procedurally barred. C. Motion to Modify Sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28922 - 2007-05-07
. Accordingly, Critton’s ineffective assistance claims are procedurally barred. C. Motion to Modify Sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28922 - 2007-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
of Trempealeau v. Mikrut, 2004 WI 79, ¶1, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190, for the proposition that “[c]ircuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36120 - 2009-04-08
of Trempealeau v. Mikrut, 2004 WI 79, ¶1, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190, for the proposition that “[c]ircuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36120 - 2009-04-08
State v. Tara S.
that the test for termination “requires the [c]ourt to consider all the circumstances,” and that, “for obvious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5931 - 2005-03-31
that the test for termination “requires the [c]ourt to consider all the circumstances,” and that, “for obvious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5931 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
either argument. See State v. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514 (Ct. App. 1989) (“[C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37044 - 2014-09-15
either argument. See State v. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514 (Ct. App. 1989) (“[C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37044 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
are treated as one, however. See § 346.63(1)(c). For convenience, I will refer to the convictions as one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49411 - 2014-09-15
are treated as one, however. See § 346.63(1)(c). For convenience, I will refer to the convictions as one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49411 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan C. Garcia
STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JONATHAN C. GARCIA, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10597 - 2017-09-20
STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JONATHAN C. GARCIA, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10597 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
to discover/notice that trial counsel failed to investigate or call to trial to testify witness[es] James C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49839 - 2014-09-15
to discover/notice that trial counsel failed to investigate or call to trial to testify witness[es] James C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49839 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eric C. Abrams
-RESPONDENT, V. ERIC C. ABRAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10633 - 2017-09-20
-RESPONDENT, V. ERIC C. ABRAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10633 - 2017-09-20