Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25061 - 25070 of 83396 for case search.
Search results 25061 - 25070 of 83396 for case search.
Thomas Moullette v. City of Rice Lake
that as in the [Fritsch v. St. Croix Cent. Sch. Dist., 183 Wis. 2d 336, 515 N.W.2d 328 (Ct. App. 1994)] case, if we ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4915 - 2005-03-31
that as in the [Fritsch v. St. Croix Cent. Sch. Dist., 183 Wis. 2d 336, 515 N.W.2d 328 (Ct. App. 1994)] case, if we ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4915 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 180
2009 WI APP 180 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP460-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44050 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 180 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP460-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44050 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court dismissed Preston Straub as a defendant, amended the case caption to name “The Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416640 - 2021-08-26
, the circuit court dismissed Preston Straub as a defendant, amended the case caption to name “The Estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416640 - 2021-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
a case consolidation document at that hearing, which set forth the same agreement.[2] The plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97931 - 2013-06-10
a case consolidation document at that hearing, which set forth the same agreement.[2] The plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97931 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not given the opportunity to hear and examine evidence that bears on a significant issue in the case, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540916 - 2022-07-08
was not given the opportunity to hear and examine evidence that bears on a significant issue in the case, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540916 - 2022-07-08
Judith H. Atkinson v. Everbrite, Inc.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1806
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14192 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 98-1806
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14192 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Nesbitt
. Our review of the trial court’s use of the repeater penalty in this case requires the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13113 - 2005-03-31
. Our review of the trial court’s use of the repeater penalty in this case requires the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the burglaries in this case. The court also theorized that Fish had burglarized in Burnett County more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855305 - 2024-10-01
to the burglaries in this case. The court also theorized that Fish had burglarized in Burnett County more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855305 - 2024-10-01
Courtney Nunez v. American Family Mutual Insurance
2003 WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-1041 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5173 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-1041 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bruce L. Ottinger v. Jose Pinel
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3403 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11758 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3403 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11758 - 2017-09-20