Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25091 - 25100 of 64042 for records/1000.

[PDF] Wells Andrew McGiffert v. Frank Carl Rozowski, Jr.
that McGiffert’s claims arose out of intentional acts. Without citation to the record, Rozowski states that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2398 - 2017-09-19

State v. Donnie Lee Lacy
it. The stipulation, however, was not made part of the record during the State's case. After the State rested, Lacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9808 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
on the record. M.P. understood that Bailey’s case was different from the case of which she had personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106741 - 2014-01-14

COURT OF APPEALS
will not reverse a trial court’s order denying a § 806.07 motion for relief if the record shows that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101818 - 2013-09-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the record and are not disputed. ¶3 In 2011, a judgment of divorce was granted to Mark and Catherine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232923 - 2019-01-17

State v. Gilbert H. Butzlaff
, 535 N.W.2d 777, 779 (Ct. App. 1995). If the record reflects that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10904 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 156
” suspensions on his Illinois driving record, which was attached and incorporated into the amended complaint.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41541 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, but followed the parties’ recommendation and withheld sentence “given the record now before this Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130022 - 2017-09-21

Rule Order
card under s. 343.50 or 343.51, and social security number, as permitted by law and any record sharing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33458 - 2008-07-16

State v. Jack L. Cox
exercised its discretion in accordance with acceptable legal standards and the facts of record. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10135 - 2005-03-31