Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2511 - 2520 of 16942 for "48.44" +50.

State v. Lamardus D. Ford
, and (2) was not supported by probable cause. We agree and reverse his conviction. BACKGROUND At 10:50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11512 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of $1,800 provided for a 50/50 split of the parties’ income. This conclusion was consistent with what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448261 - 2021-11-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
told Wollin that “all that she needed to do was pay the $50 permit fee [for building the new garage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116680 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 40
errors only.” See State v. Jeffrie C.B., 218 Wis. 2d 145, 149-50, 579 N.W.2d 69 (Ct. App. 1998). Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366044 - 2021-07-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that one of the jurors had asked the bailiff what to do “if we’re 50/50.” The bailiff told the juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76501 - 2014-09-15

Shirley A. Smedema v. Milwaukee Guardian Insurance Company
fees shall be $100; when it is less than $1,000 and is $500 or over, $50; when it is less than $500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10562 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Roger M. Spencer
police officer to believe that the defendant probably committed a crime. State v. Paszek, 50 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2483 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
., ¶¶3-4. According to the Member’s Agreement, Monnier held a 50% interest; Paul and Gregory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27980 - 2007-01-30

TMI, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
in tips (approximately $50/night) as in wages ($30-$50/night). Some of the dancers worked for tips alone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10521 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). Rather, the trial court is required to hold an evidentiary hearing only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347515 - 2021-03-23