Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2511 - 2520 of 29713 for des.
Search results 2511 - 2520 of 29713 for des.
State v. James Metz
ultimate findings on consent and voluntariness—is de novo. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d at 194–195, 577 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15259 - 2005-03-31
ultimate findings on consent and voluntariness—is de novo. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d at 194–195, 577 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15259 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court for de novo review. After a hearing, the court denied Nigl’s requests and this appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244248 - 2019-07-30
court for de novo review. After a hearing, the court denied Nigl’s requests and this appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244248 - 2019-07-30
[PDF]
State v. Timothy S. Kuklinski
of Review. This court will determine de novo whether undisputed facts show probable cause. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20
of Review. This court will determine de novo whether undisputed facts show probable cause. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10777 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on undisputed facts. We review summary judgment de novo, following the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162416 - 2017-09-21
on undisputed facts. We review summary judgment de novo, following the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162416 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which this court reviews de novo. Id. In addition, this appeal requires this court to interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212272 - 2018-05-03
, which this court reviews de novo. Id. In addition, this appeal requires this court to interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212272 - 2018-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
[of the search].” Miller does not contest the circuit court’s findings of fact. On our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74744 - 2011-12-05
[of the search].” Miller does not contest the circuit court’s findings of fact. On our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74744 - 2011-12-05
State Public Defender v. Circuit Court for Fond Du Lac County
. An appellate court is not bound by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8249 - 2005-03-31
. An appellate court is not bound by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8249 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
may be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference, or de novo review, depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112739 - 2014-05-21
may be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference, or de novo review, depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112739 - 2014-05-21
[PDF]
Timothy Wrase v. City of Neenah
agreed with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13316 - 2017-09-21
agreed with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13316 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Gary A. Miller
reviewed the family court commissioner's decision de novo and in October 2002 issued a written decision
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20065 - 2005-10-24
reviewed the family court commissioner's decision de novo and in October 2002 issued a written decision
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20065 - 2005-10-24