Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2511 - 2520 of 29821 for des.
Search results 2511 - 2520 of 29821 for des.
[PDF]
State v. John W. Knoppe
presents a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13304 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of law that we decide de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13304 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dayon R. Walker
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5071 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5071 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Donna Shirley v. William J. Mallory
), we are presented with a question of law which we review de novo. See Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10073 - 2017-09-19
), we are presented with a question of law which we review de novo. See Brandt v. Brandt, 145 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10073 - 2017-09-19
Gary Wistrom v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3613 - 2005-11-21
summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3613 - 2005-11-21
State v. Christina M. Goerlitz
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Grant County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Natalie Baker v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. The third and lowest level of review provides that we will review the conclusions or interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11929 - 2017-09-21
. The third and lowest level of review provides that we will review the conclusions or interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11929 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. We granted the PSC’s motion. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶10 We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29202 - 2007-05-29
. We granted the PSC’s motion. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶10 We review summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29202 - 2007-05-29
[PDF]
Timothy Wrase v. City of Neenah
agreed with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13316 - 2017-09-21
agreed with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13316 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert J. Smothers
or seizure passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12965 - 2005-03-31
or seizure passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12965 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 68
that we review de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137–138, 456 N.W.2d 830, 833 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36095 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137–138, 456 N.W.2d 830, 833 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36095 - 2014-09-15