Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2511 - 2520 of 15404 for probate.
Search results 2511 - 2520 of 15404 for probate.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
transcript; and his arrest was the result of the police using his probation agent as a “stalking horse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716538 - 2023-10-17
transcript; and his arrest was the result of the police using his probation agent as a “stalking horse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716538 - 2023-10-17
[PDF]
State v. John C. Vang
withheld sentence and imposed thirteen years’ probation on the burglary conviction, six years’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4399 - 2017-09-19
withheld sentence and imposed thirteen years’ probation on the burglary conviction, six years’ probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4399 - 2017-09-19
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
sentence on the rest of the charges and placed Rychtik on probation. ¶3 Rychtik then filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4661 - 2005-03-31
sentence on the rest of the charges and placed Rychtik on probation. ¶3 Rychtik then filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4661 - 2005-03-31
State v. John C. Vang
. § 943.10(1)(a). The circuit court withheld sentence and imposed thirteen years’ probation on the burglary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4399 - 2005-03-31
. § 943.10(1)(a). The circuit court withheld sentence and imposed thirteen years’ probation on the burglary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4399 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that his restitution obligation should be rescinded because he is not eligible for probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75605 - 2011-12-27
contends that his restitution obligation should be rescinded because he is not eligible for probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75605 - 2011-12-27
James D. Luedtke v. David H. Schwarz
reviewing probation revocation determinations, we defer to the division’s determinations. The scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
reviewing probation revocation determinations, we defer to the division’s determinations. The scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10070 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
these offenses while on probation for a prior offense, explaining “[t]hat doesn’t bode well for [Beard’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48451 - 2010-03-29
these offenses while on probation for a prior offense, explaining “[t]hat doesn’t bode well for [Beard’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48451 - 2010-03-29
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
sentence on the rest of the charges and placed Rychtik on probation. ¶3 Rychtik then filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4662 - 2005-03-31
sentence on the rest of the charges and placed Rychtik on probation. ¶3 Rychtik then filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4662 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
sentence on the rest of the charges and placed Rychtik on probation. ¶3 Rychtik then filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4657 - 2005-03-31
sentence on the rest of the charges and placed Rychtik on probation. ¶3 Rychtik then filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4657 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, on count two. The trial court then stayed the sentence and placed Johnson on probation for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31116 - 2007-12-10
, on count two. The trial court then stayed the sentence and placed Johnson on probation for three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31116 - 2007-12-10