Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2511 - 2520 of 20932 for word.
Search results 2511 - 2520 of 20932 for word.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
"substantial compliance" is good enough. The referee opined that failure to use the word "suspension
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209061 - 2018-03-01
"substantial compliance" is good enough. The referee opined that failure to use the word "suspension
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209061 - 2018-03-01
State v. Garrett Ely
(1996) (quoted source omitted). “Ambiguity can be found in the words of the statutory provision itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14129 - 2005-03-31
(1996) (quoted source omitted). “Ambiguity can be found in the words of the statutory provision itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
v. Cross, 2010 WI 70, ¶4, 326 Wis. 2d 492, 786 N.W.2d 64. “In other words, where a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353334 - 2021-04-06
v. Cross, 2010 WI 70, ¶4, 326 Wis. 2d 492, 786 N.W.2d 64. “In other words, where a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353334 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
WI APP 22
of the word” and that Orbitz “lacks the essential functions and characteristics of a business which provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161398 - 2017-09-21
of the word” and that Orbitz “lacks the essential functions and characteristics of a business which provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161398 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d at 507). In other words, we must “decide whether ‘any possibility exists that the trier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945880 - 2025-04-22
Wis. 2d at 507). In other words, we must “decide whether ‘any possibility exists that the trier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=945880 - 2025-04-22
State v. Virgil L. Burks
in the trial court. We see no meaningful distinction between the words, except that one describes the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6183 - 2005-03-31
in the trial court. We see no meaningful distinction between the words, except that one describes the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Cynthia reemphasized these points. While she did not explicitly use the words “insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904184 - 2025-01-22
, Cynthia reemphasized these points. While she did not explicitly use the words “insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904184 - 2025-01-22
State v. Timothy J. Johnson
when we give its words their commonly accepted meanings, we ordinarily stop the inquiry. Id. Context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19295 - 2005-09-19
when we give its words their commonly accepted meanings, we ordinarily stop the inquiry. Id. Context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19295 - 2005-09-19
Ambrose H. Wilger v. Dodge County Planning and Development Department
. “The necessity of looking to a standard dictionary to ascertain the usual meaning of a word does not render
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14135 - 2005-03-31
. “The necessity of looking to a standard dictionary to ascertain the usual meaning of a word does not render
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14135 - 2005-03-31
Herbert M. Schauer v. Matthew S. Baker
of the word. Rather, they contend they exercised “dominion over a portion of [the Baker] property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5392 - 2005-03-31
of the word. Rather, they contend they exercised “dominion over a portion of [the Baker] property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5392 - 2005-03-31