Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2511 - 2520 of 49847 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 2511 - 2520 of 49847 for writ of certiorari forms.
Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Polk County Board of Adjustment
the administrator’s interpretation of the applicable ordinances. Hoey sought certiorari review of the board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14174 - 2005-03-31
the administrator’s interpretation of the applicable ordinances. Hoey sought certiorari review of the board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14174 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Polk County Board of Adjustment
, supported the administrator’s interpretation of the applicable ordinances. Hoey sought certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14174 - 2014-09-15
, supported the administrator’s interpretation of the applicable ordinances. Hoey sought certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14174 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert E. Bowman v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
., Dykman, P.J., and Roggensack, J. ROGGENSACK, J. On this certiorari review of the Dane County board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11252 - 2017-09-19
., Dykman, P.J., and Roggensack, J. ROGGENSACK, J. On this certiorari review of the Dane County board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11252 - 2017-09-19
Robert E. Bowman v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
., and Roggensack, J. ROGGENSACK, J. On this certiorari review of the Dane County board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11252 - 2005-03-31
., and Roggensack, J. ROGGENSACK, J. On this certiorari review of the Dane County board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Daniel Aguilar v. Matthew J. Frank
for certiorari review of the resulting prison disciplinary decision. For the reasons discussed below, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19117 - 2017-09-21
for certiorari review of the resulting prison disciplinary decision. For the reasons discussed below, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19117 - 2017-09-21
Daniel Aguilar v. Matthew J. Frank
a circuit court order dismissing his action for certiorari review of the resulting prison disciplinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19117 - 2005-07-27
a circuit court order dismissing his action for certiorari review of the resulting prison disciplinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19117 - 2005-07-27
[PDF]
Donald A. Thompson v. Lacrosse County Board of Adjustment
their amended petition for writ of certiorari January 13, 1994. They alleged that: If the setback
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8062 - 2017-09-19
their amended petition for writ of certiorari January 13, 1994. They alleged that: If the setback
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8062 - 2017-09-19
Town of Norway Sanitary District #1 v. Racine County Drainage Board of Commissioners
upheld its assessment, it petitioned the trial court for a writ of certiorari to review the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13085 - 2005-03-31
upheld its assessment, it petitioned the trial court for a writ of certiorari to review the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13085 - 2005-03-31
Donald A. Thompson v. Lacrosse County Board of Adjustment
. The Thompsons filed their amended petition for writ of certiorari January 13, 1994. They alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8062 - 2005-03-31
. The Thompsons filed their amended petition for writ of certiorari January 13, 1994. They alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8062 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Richard L. Hermann v. Town of Delavan
in assessment rolls are often addressed “by certiorari to review the action of boards of review.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10266 - 2017-09-20
in assessment rolls are often addressed “by certiorari to review the action of boards of review.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10266 - 2017-09-20