Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25101 - 25110 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
Search results 25101 - 25110 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
Jeff S. Schmeling v. Richard J. Phelps
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2661
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11431 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2661
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11431 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jeff S. Schmeling v. Richard J. Phelps
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2661 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11431 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2661 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11431 - 2017-09-19
State v. Willie S. Davis
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2005 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20259 - 2005-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2005 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20259 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
State v. Willie S. Davis
22, 2005, this court issued an order holding the State’s status report in abeyance and directing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20259 - 2017-09-21
22, 2005, this court issued an order holding the State’s status report in abeyance and directing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20259 - 2017-09-21
State v. John W. Kelley
2001 WI 84 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-1066 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17507 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI 84 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-1066 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17507 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court said that “[a]lthough cases sometimes use the words ‘forfeiture’ and ‘waiver’ interchangeably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491819 - 2022-03-08
court said that “[a]lthough cases sometimes use the words ‘forfeiture’ and ‘waiver’ interchangeably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491819 - 2022-03-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was prepared to do in every case.” The court found that the changed language did not preclude further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259855 - 2020-05-07
was prepared to do in every case.” The court found that the changed language did not preclude further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259855 - 2020-05-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 16, 2025 Samuel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011144 - 2025-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 16, 2025 Samuel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011144 - 2025-09-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 20, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227597 - 2018-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 20, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227597 - 2018-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the facts of this case are similar to those in Plude, wherein our supreme court concluded that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209384 - 2018-07-23
that the facts of this case are similar to those in Plude, wherein our supreme court concluded that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209384 - 2018-07-23

