Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25101 - 25110 of 41665 for new88v.net ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน new88 ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน new 88 ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน new88vnet ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน nha cai new88 ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿน new88v.net.

COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief, arguing that his new sentence was unduly harsh and that the convictions for recklessly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54717 - 2010-09-20

CA Blank Order
stated no objection to that proposal. As the court was in the process of scheduling a new sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92170 - 2013-01-28

CA Blank Order
. Kieffer Gray & Associates, LLP 16345 W. Glendale Dr. New Berlin, WI 53151-2841 Roger A. Sage Roger Sage
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91324 - 2013-01-03

COURT OF APPEALS
extended supervision in case No. 2003CF2989 and to a new charge in the instant case. While the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110526 - 2014-04-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 303-04 (2004) and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000) (any fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49296 - 2010-04-26

[PDF] State v. Dwayne E. Hudson
was a new offense, wholly unconnected to the crimes underlying Hudsonโ€™s supervision. The sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18444 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Synthia O'Grady v. Michael S. O'Grady
properly treated the present motion as a new motion to modify placement and custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25967 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
milestones was a new factor supporting sentence modification. The postconviction motion was denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192226 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
with the help of a new inmate assistant, and he asks that we give him permission to return to the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107407 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
modification based on new factors must be presented to the sentencing court, not this court. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817858 - 2024-06-26