Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25111 - 25120 of 58928 for quit claim deed.

Toyota Financial Services v. James Vasel
evidencing the transaction under § 425.109(1)(h). ¶6 The trial court rejected all of these claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5886 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction motion for plea withdrawal, claiming her pleas were not knowing, intelligent and voluntary because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132233 - 2014-12-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
”) protective placement and an order denying his postdisposition motion. Tim claims that: (1) the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815536 - 2024-06-19

Jeanette Schwarzbach v. Steven Thelen
from judgments dismissing their claim that Steve Thelen and Thelen Sand & Gravel, Inc., tortiously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4107 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Randall G. Bobholz v. John Banaszak
. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J.1 John Banaszak appeals a small claims judgment awarding Randall and Doris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5235 - 2017-09-19

State v. Raul M. Cordova
was unconstitutional because consent was not freely given. Supporting his motion, Cordova claimed that Feliberta did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14185 - 2005-03-31

Delores Hoffman v. Memorial Hospital of Iowa County
764 (1994). The court quoted Rineck, noting: "Chapter 655 sets tort claims produced by medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8121 - 2005-03-31

Calumet County Health & Social Services v. Michael J.R.
, raises three arguments, each of which we reject. His claim that Wis. Stat. § 48.415(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4240 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jose G. Corpus
Corpus’s claim that he did not understand the plea proceeding because a Spanish interpreter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19314 - 2017-09-21

Aubrey Walker, Jr. v. Steven E. O'Brien
and Audrey O’Brien cross-appeal. They seek dismissal of the Walkers’ claim for intentional misrepresentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3244 - 2005-03-31