Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25111 - 25120 of 64166 for records.
Search results 25111 - 25120 of 64166 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=437806 - 2021-10-07
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=437806 - 2021-10-07
CA Blank Order
in favor of Kimmons. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100727 - 2013-08-12
in favor of Kimmons. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100727 - 2013-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=496245 - 2022-03-17
review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=496245 - 2022-03-17
State v. William R. Gates
decisions, sentences must have a reasonable basis in the record and demonstrate a logical process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9332 - 2005-03-31
decisions, sentences must have a reasonable basis in the record and demonstrate a logical process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9332 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and elected not to do so. Following a preliminary review of the record, this court directed counsel to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698540 - 2023-09-06
and elected not to do so. Following a preliminary review of the record, this court directed counsel to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698540 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the presentence report. Based upon our review of the briefs and No. 2024AP1973-CR 2 Record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064312 - 2026-01-21
in the presentence report. Based upon our review of the briefs and No. 2024AP1973-CR 2 Record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064312 - 2026-01-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143545 - 2017-09-21
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143545 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but has not responded. Upon an independent review of the record and counsel’s report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151509 - 2017-09-21
a response, but has not responded. Upon an independent review of the record and counsel’s report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151509 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on a misapprehension of the record and the law. ¶6 The criminal complaint in this matter was filed on November 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62865 - 2014-09-15
on a misapprehension of the record and the law. ¶6 The criminal complaint in this matter was filed on November 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62865 - 2014-09-15
Victor M. Kennedy v. Adobe Center Administration
in s. 19.62 (5). (d) “Record” has the meaning given in s. 19.32 (2). (1m) Whoever, with intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8392 - 2005-03-31
in s. 19.62 (5). (d) “Record” has the meaning given in s. 19.32 (2). (1m) Whoever, with intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8392 - 2005-03-31