Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25121 - 25130 of 30072 for de.

[PDF] Kenneth Ness and Susan Ness v. Digital Dial Communications, Inc.
of statutory construction, a question of law which we review de novo. J.L. Phillips & Assocs., Inc. v. E&H
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17191 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Advantage Leasing Corporation v. Novatech Solutions, Inc.
. Discussion ¶10 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17885 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30607 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Julie Ann Quinn
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Martin, 156 Wis.2d 399, 402, 456 N.W.2d 892, 894
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13629 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
carefully considered the applicable law de novo the court concludes that, based on the record, Colon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183419 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Miguel A. Rivera v. Beth T. Vandeboom
N.W.2d 852 (1957), Simon v. Van de Hey, 269 Wis. 50, 55, 68 N.W.2d 529 (1955), and Anderson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3065 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.08 (2007-08).[3] An appellate court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, and applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45529 - 2010-01-11

[PDF] NOTICE
decisions to grant or deny summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29516 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to relief.” Id., ¶14. This is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id., ¶9. “If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137005 - 2015-03-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192134 - 2017-09-21