Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25131 - 25140 of 34920 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Total Biaya Membangun Rumah Budget 50 Jt Terpercaya Laweyan Surakarta.

[PDF] State v. Michael W. Slinker
County court believed that a total of twenty-five years was an appropriate sentence for Slinker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3938 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Joseph P. Hogan
. ¶8 In determining whether probable cause exists for an arrest, we must look to the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17631 - 2017-09-21

State v. Andres Godina
recommendation and “impose the consecutive time which totals 18 months in the county jail.” In his sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13092 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard L. Harris
are instructed to consider the totality of the evidence before the trier of fact. See id. at 129-30, 449 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10759 - 2005-03-31

Mark Johnson (Deceased) v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
development], compensation and death benefits provided in this chapter shall be increased 15% but the total
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13012 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Paul R. Horvath v.
that the total amount collected was $13,638, from which he had deducted $2727.60 as his fee. When the attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17292 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
considered relevant sentencing objectives and factors. The concurrent and consecutive sentences totaling
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728260 - 2023-11-14

COURT OF APPEALS
consecutive sentences totaling nineteen years’ initial confinement and eleven years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125348 - 2014-10-27

Jennifer Jo Morse v. Carl E. Morse
evaluation with proposition that dependent partner may be entitled to fifty percent of the parties’ total
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2716 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gaspar S. Montoya
that is just totally mutually exclusive.” This passage contains only a concession that “perhaps” the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16253 - 2005-03-31