Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25131 - 25140 of 38217 for ph d.
Search results 25131 - 25140 of 38217 for ph d.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, asserting he “believe[d]” that the State “may have breached the plea agreement.” Counsel conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613536 - 2023-01-24
, asserting he “believe[d]” that the State “may have breached the plea agreement.” Counsel conceded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613536 - 2023-01-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing. D. Sufficiency of the Evidence An issue that both Martinez and counsel address is whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146888 - 2017-09-21
hearing. D. Sufficiency of the Evidence An issue that both Martinez and counsel address is whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146888 - 2017-09-21
State v. Leon J. Lace
is not recommended. [1] The Honorable Jacqueline D. Schellinger presided over the trial and entered the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19446 - 2005-08-29
is not recommended. [1] The Honorable Jacqueline D. Schellinger presided over the trial and entered the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19446 - 2005-08-29
[PDF]
State v. Michael Lee Webster
: Milwaukee (If "Special", JUDGE: ARLENE D. CONNORS so indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7732 - 2017-09-19
: Milwaukee (If "Special", JUDGE: ARLENE D. CONNORS so indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7732 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(d) (2021-22). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888389 - 2024-12-12
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(d) (2021-22). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888389 - 2024-12-12
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Door County: D. T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105607 - 2013-12-16
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Door County: D. T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105607 - 2013-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 866 (Ct. App. 1979). “[D]iscretion contemplates a process of reasoning to be explicated upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88856 - 2012-10-31
N.W.2d 866 (Ct. App. 1979). “[D]iscretion contemplates a process of reasoning to be explicated upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88856 - 2012-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV NO. 2011AP819 W. D. HOARD & SONS CO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82624 - 2014-09-15
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV NO. 2011AP819 W. D. HOARD & SONS CO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82624 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
: ATTORNEYS: For the defendant-appellant, there were briefs filed and an oral argument by Colleen D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214547 - 2018-08-08
: ATTORNEYS: For the defendant-appellant, there were briefs filed and an oral argument by Colleen D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214547 - 2018-08-08
State v. Margaret H.
Thelma D., the foster mother, was unwilling to adopt the twins, they were uprooted yet again and placed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17525 - 2005-03-31
Thelma D., the foster mother, was unwilling to adopt the twins, they were uprooted yet again and placed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17525 - 2005-03-31