Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25141 - 25150 of 29985 for de.
Search results 25141 - 25150 of 29985 for de.
[PDF]
WI APP 36
to undisputed facts is a question of law for our de novo review. See Knight v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28134 - 2014-09-15
to undisputed facts is a question of law for our de novo review. See Knight v. Milwaukee County, 2002 WI 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28134 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 210
judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶9 Here, Cuellar contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26418 - 2014-09-15
judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶9 Here, Cuellar contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26418 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41513 - 2014-09-15
entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41513 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 369, 805 N.W.2d 334, 339
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112198 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 369, 805 N.W.2d 334, 339
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112198 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Arlene A. Thiery v. Charles M. Bye
and consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14559 - 2017-09-21
and consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14559 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
for summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Everson v. Lorenz, 2005 WI 51, ¶9, 280 Wis. 2d 1, 695 N.W.2d 298
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108783 - 2014-03-05
for summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Everson v. Lorenz, 2005 WI 51, ¶9, 280 Wis. 2d 1, 695 N.W.2d 298
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108783 - 2014-03-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26853 - 2014-09-15
and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26853 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Barbara E. Harp
(8)(a), an assertion that raises a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20087 - 2017-09-21
(8)(a), an assertion that raises a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20087 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert A. Evans
. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7046 - 2005-03-31
. Id. at 637. We review de novo whether performance was deficient and prejudiced the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7046 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “‘[w]e review de novo the legal questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208193 - 2018-02-13
review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, “‘[w]e review de novo the legal questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208193 - 2018-02-13

