Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25141 - 25150 of 30247 for de.
Search results 25141 - 25150 of 30247 for de.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a defendant was denied the right to a speedy trial is a question of law we review de novo. 4 See id., ¶10
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152325 - 2017-09-21
a defendant was denied the right to a speedy trial is a question of law we review de novo. 4 See id., ¶10
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152325 - 2017-09-21
State v. James A. Schmidt
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Stary, 187 Wis. 2d 266, 269, 522 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7440 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo. State v. Stary, 187 Wis. 2d 266, 269, 522 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7440 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony D.B.
. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Curiel, 227 Wis. 2d 389, 404
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17370 - 2005-03-31
. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Curiel, 227 Wis. 2d 389, 404
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17370 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sylvester J. Sasnett, Jr.
. This review is de novo. State v. Toliver, 187 Wis.2d 346, 360, 523 N.W.2d 113, 118 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8326 - 2005-03-31
. This review is de novo. State v. Toliver, 187 Wis.2d 346, 360, 523 N.W.2d 113, 118 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8326 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, prejudicial preliminary hearing. According to Harris, the preliminary hearing was used as a de facto evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56204 - 2010-11-01
, prejudicial preliminary hearing. According to Harris, the preliminary hearing was used as a de facto evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56204 - 2010-11-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998). We apply these standards de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72904 - 2014-09-15
, 585 N.W.2d 640 (Ct. App. 1998). We apply these standards de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Gerald Gielow v. Thaddeus F. G. Napiorkowski
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Miller ex rel. Fehring v. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6032 - 2017-09-19
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Miller ex rel. Fehring v. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6032 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dennis H. Murphy
review de novo. Id. ¶8 There is no dispute here that trial counsel did not ask any witness about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6612 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. Id. ¶8 There is no dispute here that trial counsel did not ask any witness about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6612 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Advantage Leasing Corporation v. Novatech Solutions, Inc.
. Discussion ¶10 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17885 - 2017-09-21
. Discussion ¶10 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same method employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17885 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.08(2) (2019- 20).6 We review a summary judgment determination de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516405 - 2022-05-03
. § 802.08(2) (2019- 20).6 We review a summary judgment determination de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516405 - 2022-05-03