Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25141 - 25150 of 44408 for name change.
Search results 25141 - 25150 of 44408 for name change.
State v. Ronald G. Nadolski
changed his decision to plead no contest. Moreover, Nadolski needed to make a showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15788 - 2005-03-31
changed his decision to plead no contest. Moreover, Nadolski needed to make a showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15788 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of procedural errors. Collazo was not entitled to a hearing before changes were made in response to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32531 - 2014-09-15
of procedural errors. Collazo was not entitled to a hearing before changes were made in response to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32531 - 2014-09-15
State v. Shamseldin Ali Abdelwarress
, that there is an “adequate reason for the defendant's change of heart” other than “the desire to have a trial.” Id., 161 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9685 - 2005-03-31
, that there is an “adequate reason for the defendant's change of heart” other than “the desire to have a trial.” Id., 161 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9685 - 2005-03-31
Vera Flanagan v. City of New London
, but assessed twenty-five percent contributory negligence against Flanagan. New London moved to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7713 - 2005-03-31
, but assessed twenty-five percent contributory negligence against Flanagan. New London moved to change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7713 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas J. Mola
number of read-ins would not have changed its sentence because its focus had been on Mola’s inability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6867 - 2005-03-31
number of read-ins would not have changed its sentence because its focus had been on Mola’s inability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6867 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Peter P. Gintner v. Lori Ann Gintner
that there was nothing in that custody study which suggested that Peter’s relationship with Haas would change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13459 - 2017-09-21
that there was nothing in that custody study which suggested that Peter’s relationship with Haas would change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13459 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the car June 11, ’08. I had the car inspected June 20, ’08. Russ Darrow changed date from June 20, ’08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54834 - 2014-09-15
the car June 11, ’08. I had the car inspected June 20, ’08. Russ Darrow changed date from June 20, ’08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54834 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
nothing to change our conclusion. In imposing the maximum sentence authorized by law, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238930 - 2019-04-16
nothing to change our conclusion. In imposing the maximum sentence authorized by law, the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238930 - 2019-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court did not violate double jeopardy when it changed a sentence that it had imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88488 - 2014-09-15
that the circuit court did not violate double jeopardy when it changed a sentence that it had imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88488 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
not to be credible. Voigt’s assertion is accurate, but does not change our decision. The hearing officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30063 - 2014-09-15
not to be credible. Voigt’s assertion is accurate, but does not change our decision. The hearing officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30063 - 2014-09-15