Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25151 - 25160 of 30059 for de.
Search results 25151 - 25160 of 30059 for de.
State v. Nathaniel D. Washington
to relief, and therefore justify an evidentiary hearing, is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11591 - 2005-03-31
to relief, and therefore justify an evidentiary hearing, is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11591 - 2005-03-31
Erika Eneman v. Pat Richter
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11536 - 2005-03-31
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11536 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Eli Mendez v. BG Products, Inc.
. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). Our review is de novo and independent of the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15943 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). Our review is de novo and independent of the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15943 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same methodology employed by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41979 - 2009-11-23
perform summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same methodology employed by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41979 - 2009-11-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d at 22. I. The circuit court’s findings under WIS. STAT. § 54.10(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589777 - 2022-11-15
review de novo. Coston, 222 Wis. 2d at 22. I. The circuit court’s findings under WIS. STAT. § 54.10(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589777 - 2022-11-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, but we review de novo whether counsel’s conduct constitutes constitutionally ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=577798 - 2022-10-19
erroneous, but we review de novo whether counsel’s conduct constitutes constitutionally ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=577798 - 2022-10-19
[PDF]
William Speener v. Donald Gudmanson
” provided in § 801.02(7)(a)1. ¶9 Statutory construction presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15204 - 2017-09-21
” provided in § 801.02(7)(a)1. ¶9 Statutory construction presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15204 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Randall Schwartz v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
, and we answer the question on a de novo basis. No. 02-0372 12 3. Allocation of the Payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4926 - 2017-09-19
, and we answer the question on a de novo basis. No. 02-0372 12 3. Allocation of the Payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4926 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Gerald Gielow v. Thaddeus F. G. Napiorkowski
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Miller ex rel. Fehring v. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6032 - 2017-09-19
de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Miller ex rel. Fehring v. Wausau
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6032 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
SCR CHAPTER 21
and to prosecute de minimis violations. Discretion permits the office to prioritize resources on matters where
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1019167 - 2025-10-01
and to prosecute de minimis violations. Discretion permits the office to prioritize resources on matters where
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1019167 - 2025-10-01