Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25151 - 25160 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] Jeffrey Loy v. Dodgeville School District
apply the same methodology as the trial court and review de novo the grant or denial of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6690 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo. Munger v. Seehafer, 2016 WI App 89, ¶46, 372 Wis. 2d 749, 890 N.W.2d 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871872 - 2024-11-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
such that the opposing party is entitled to a trial.” Id. On appeal, I review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936230 - 2025-04-03

[PDF] WI 82
of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. Adams Outdoor Adver., Ltd. v. City of Madison, 294 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68431 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Town of Neenah Sanitary District No. 2 v. City of Neenah
We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Weigel v. Grimmett, 173 Wis. 2d 263
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4393 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Kevin W. McCrary v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
here. This presents a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Zimbrick, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3926 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI App 54
of law that we decide de novo. Kimberly Area Sch. Dist. v. LIRC, 2005 WI App 262, ¶¶9, 12-13, 288 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383478 - 2021-09-08

Denise Block v. Anthony Gomez
). Because the trial court's ruling in the case at bar raises an issue of law, our review is de novo. See Old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7850 - 2005-03-31

State v. Leonard T. Collins
. Stat. §§ 939.62 and 973.12. Statutory interpretation is an issue of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4299 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 210
judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶9 Here, Cuellar contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26418 - 2014-09-15