Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25151 - 25160 of 63530 for records/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93166 - 2013-02-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
an evidentiary hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22

Racine County v. James P. G.
record, that the individual would be a proper subject for commitment if treatment were withdrawn.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19114 - 2005-07-26

CA Blank Order
records, this court concludes that no issue of arguable merit could be raised on appeal and affirms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138362 - 2015-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910139 - 2025-02-06

CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144923 - 2015-07-28

[PDF] State v. Adam C.
3 the motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing, concluding that “the record as a whole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13438 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187331 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Racine County v. James P. G.
evidence “that there is a substantial likelihood, based on the subject’s individual treatment record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19114 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
, the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the circuit court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31113 - 2014-09-15